NO HELICOPTER BASE HERE
  • News
    • Media
    • Politicians addresses
  • Proposal
  • Helicopter Noise/safety

Write to the Federal Environment Department

31/1/2021

0 Comments

 
We have  composed a draft  letter for you to send to the  Federal Environment Department asking them to remind the heliport proponent,  Ray Cronin of Mission Helicopters,  of his obligation to refer any development that is likely to have a significant impact on a matter of National Environmental Significance,  to be assessed under the EPBC Act 

 Download the  document below.
​​Please read  the document and write  a letter in your own words    using any of the points  in our draft.
Your letter will  have  more weight if it is written in your own words.
Picture
Thanks for taking the time.
0 Comments

Community told "You have the right of appeal"

31/1/2021

2 Comments

 
In Oct 2017   the   50th Anniversary of the saving of   Ellison Reef from lime mining was celebrated at Ninney Rise'. Guest speaker, Prof  Bob Pressey  of   ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies - JCU Townsville,   began his address,   titled  'Death by a thousand cuts' with,   "The development assessment process is broken, it's been broken for a long time and it is kept broken deliberately."
With the approval of   a heliport allowing  three medium lift helicopters to operate early morning to late afternoon, 7 days a week,  in a tourism destination known for its quiet and peaceful amenity, the community  has  become painfully aware public interest is not at the forefront of  council decision making.
The community voice  is being   ignored during the public consultation process. Decisions are made  at closed meetings   that undermine  the planning scheme, allow  destruction of the natural environment and threaten strong community held values.  The community is then   told  they have a right of reply through  court when it is unlikely   the public has the expertise, motivation or ability  to raise enough funds to launch a legal appeal  against a council decision.​
"If you don't like it,
take us to court"
​ attitude
Not just about Mission Beach - a Cassowary Coast issue
​
Council decisions  bely the  rhetoric reinforced in   their own policies, strategies and plans. Following is  from  the CCRC Corporate Plan . (below right)
Goal 2
Community FIrst
"We will listen to what people in the community are asking for, share our learnings, innovate and continuously improve to deliver sustainable facilities and services that support our vibrant communities, where health, community safety, education, arts, culture, sport and recreation enhance our lifestyle and
respect our unique natural environment.

We will continue to build social networks and provide for more engaged  community involvement in Council decision making.
​"We will listen to what people in the community are asking for and deliver  sustainable facilities and services that support our quality lifestyle and our   unique natural environment"
Future Assured
​
The approval of the  Helipad on  zoned  good agricultural land  undermines the strategic  intent of  both  State and local planning and  is a symptom of Federal and State Government devolving broad discretionary powers to local governments across Australia. ​
Picture
Community First - Goal 2 Corporate Plan
The lack of Federal and State Government oversight has resulted in Planner’s reports being produced using shallow reasoning, blatantly justifying support for developments despite conflicts with local and State planning. When Planning department recommendations or councillor decisions are questioned, the public are informed they have the right of appeal. The council’s “ If you don’t like it, take us to court” attitude treats public interest with contempt.

If the communities of the Cassowary Coast thought  they could go back to  some 'normality' after  a resounding rejection of  a  council that ruled in secrecy with  a bias embracing  speculators and developers ahead of the public interest,  the heliport decision has   given a sobering reminder that  is not the case.    A culture  was introduced  with the former council that remains entrenched  in the  operations of the so called  democratic process of our present council.

Feel secure    and watch this space. There is a heliport,  or something equally  as inappropriate or shocking,  coming to a place near you soon!​

Liz Gallie
Mission Beach Cassowaries  Inc
​0414 402 315
2 Comments

GO FUND ME  - PROTECT THE MAGIC OF MISSION BEACH

28/1/2021

2 Comments

 
We have just set up a Go Fund Me account to  raise funds for an appeal
Please send/share this  throughout your networks.

THANK YOU!
In the hope of  saving the magic of Mission Beach
For the people and the cassowaries

​Your support means the world to us

2 Comments

Community meeting held to decide future options

27/1/2021

3 Comments

 
Picture
 A   community meeting was held at C4 on Saturday 23rd January to discuss  options   following the disappointing decision  of the Council to approve  the contentious helipad development.

​Ex Cassowary Coast Regional Council Mayor, Bill Shannon, attended the meeting and was able to answer questions and clarify points  brought up during the meeting.       Bill was reminded that his council  denied    an application in 2008 lodged by the then existing  Raw Materials  owner to expand the business.    Bill agreed the application for an expansion of the business  was refused on the grounds it was  inconsistent with the intent of the planning scheme  as was  the helipad,  commenting further, "It should not have been approved".  
The community  is  grappling  to understand how   a development  residents  say will have an unacceptable impact on their lifestyle, sense of place and  the  special  environment, could be  approved against  such strong community objection.

​They  also questioned why  their Division 3  representative's   case against the development was not given more  consideration.  Cr Tschui was not asked any questions from any of the councillors including   Cr Baines, who holds  the  environment portfolio and voted for the development.  
​ There was no discussion. Those councillors who spoke, only made statements about why they were voting a  certain way, giving  the public reason to believe   the decision had been made prior to the general meeting.
Picture
Environemnt Portfilio holder - Cr Baines
Picture
Cr Farinelli
Picture
Cr Millwood
Comments about cassowaries  "In my opinion that's because helicopters fly and cassowaries don't" by Cr Farinelli  were seen by the community as not only flippant but disrespectful of a very serious  agenda item about the be  voted on.

​It was also worrying  to hear   Cr Millwood believes  the numbers of cassowaries are increasing without providing  any supporting  evidence.

​Further,   Cr Barnes emphasising the claim that  once off the ground helicopters are not council responsibility, have been  quickly corrected by CASA.   You can read  correspondence with CASA here.     Are these rational reasons   for a decision to approve the  development?

​Adding to these concerns  is the   statement, which appears to  have been  written prior the  general meeting (21st January) and  read out by the Mayor at the end of that meeting. We can only assume the whole agenda item  was bought to the  general meeting with a  pre determined outcome. Had it already been discussed at length at the Information Session held the day before? 
Picture
Deputy Mayor Cr Barnes
Picture
Mayor Cr Nolan
Where was the “robust assessment process” boasted by the Mayor? It certainly wasn’t evident at the General Meeting (21st January).

Where was the tabling, report or even discussion about the properly made and lodged petition carrying 650 signatures against the contentious proposal to place  an intrusive development  on good agricultural land that  threatens to destroy the peace and quiet  amenity of local residents?   Are these affected residents of no account to this Council? 

Where was the discussion about the content of hundreds of emails  councillors received from  local, regional and   national   people outlining their concerns?
​
A development that obviously hits at the heart of  the community and will have a major impact on the future of Mission Beach,  took   just  fourteen and a half  minutes  for the councillors to cast a vote in favour.   (see meeting video below)
  • There have  been no studies  to prove   a heliport  placed in the centre of  a comparatively    small high biodiversity area connecting two World Heritage Areas  at   the heart of Mission Beach, is low impact.  
  • There has been no reports showing any economic benefits to Mission Beach or the shire.  
  • There has been no report of    the noise  impact on  residents within the  impact zone,    of medium lift helicopters allowed to  operate  from 7am to 6pm  5 days a week and 8am to 6pm on Saturdays and Sundays.  
  • There has   been no report to show  the development will have  a low impact on cassowaries.

The council decision to approve the   amenity destroying  helicopter  project  has thrown many residents of Mission Beach into despair and a state of  anxiety.  Those who have chosen to live here have long responded to government planning processes to protect our natural environment and our village lifestyle. 

 The community now question how much  this council considers the  best interests of the public.  Most of the  councillors have demonstrated they have no  understanding of the fundamental importance of the intrinsic values of our shire to the health of our community, environment and economy.

This is not just a Mission Beach issue. The CCRC  is making decisions for the whole of the shire  using the same 'logic' and  decision making process.   A large part of that is carried out behind closed doors at pre meeting 'Councillor Information Sessions'. 

More information on  what actions  the community can  take to help, including  letter writing and fund raising for an appeal  will be distributed  soon. ​
Planners report starts at 136:00 Council 'discussion' starts at 144:40
3 Comments

Helipad takes flight -Council go-ahead despite concerns

22/1/2021

0 Comments

 
Cairns Post 22 Jan 2021
Picture
0 Comments

Council votes to  shatter jewel in the crown of Cassowary Coast

21/1/2021

1 Comment

 
 At 8am  21st January around 100 residents from Mission Beach gathered  in the park opposite the Tully  Council Chambers in anticipation of  a decision on the  proposed heliport  for  2224 Tully Mission Beach Road Mission Beach.

​Despite the  threatening weather those gathered  stayed until 11am when the helipad agenda item  was discussed  and the council cast their vote. It was with  little surprise but great disappointment  to the crowd when the councillors voted  6 - 1 in favour of the development.

​Win News  was  there to  cover the  story.
Picture
Division 3 Cr Tschui was the  single dissenting vote  saying she had listened to   her constituents   concerns.  Cr Tschui commented   the word she was looking for to describe  community  sentiment was Ethos, meaning character,   adding  "It is  used   to describe the guiding beliefs or ideals that characterize a community, nation, or ideology."
​
Cr Tschui  said the  development  "Simply does not align  with the  ethos that is Mission Beach."    and "There is nothing that lends itself  to the  lifestyle  Mission Beach is renowned for."   
Picture
Liz Gallie  of Mission Beach Cassowaries said, "It appears the Planner has attempted to  address  some of the communities concerns by  including statements about  cassowaries,  Native title land  and   defining the actual use  of the land."   "But the latest report contained even more inconsistencies and contradictions, justifying  recommending approval  of  the development, with  irrelevant   details  of  helicopter  use at other locations". 

"The main issue, noise, has not been dealt with" said Liz 
Picture
Cr Barnes emphasised  the council was not  making a decision on the impacts of helicopters while in the air only on  the development  while the helicopters are on the ground. 

Reasons given   by other councillors  for their support of the development include   
 a claim cassowary numbers are increasing and   that helicopters are  operating over lots of cassowary habitat already. 

Cr Farinelli  commented   the websites she had  consulted   didn't contain any information about helicopters and cassowaries saying. "In my  opinion, that was because helicopters fly and cassowaries don't."
 Cr Baines, who holds the CCRC environment portfolio, made no comments during the  debate and voted  to approve the development.
​
 The Mayor summed up by saying the councillors had all been well informed and could make  a considered  and informed decision adding  " The development  was overall consistent with  Cassowary Coast Regional Council Planning Scheme and the  FNQ 2031 Regional Plan. 

C4 President Peter Rowles said  "The council has approved a noisy disruption to our lifestyle  and  high value environment because  the Planning Scheme  doesn't  provide the legal protection it should"

The community say they will  now  be considering what options are available to challenge the  council's decision. 
​
See below the  live streamed meeting.
Picture
Council  meeting  21 Jan 2021  live stream.  Item 7.3 DA   Heliport  starts 1:36.00
1 Comment

Is the Planners Report designed to bamboozle the community? Further contradictions in amendments

19/1/2021

3 Comments

 
The Agenda for  the general meeting on Thursday contains amendments  to the Planners report recommending approval for the  Heliport. Agenda item 7.2. Report starts on page 245. The Planner appears to be hell bent on trying to justify the development despite the many inconsistencies, contradictions and omissions in both the DA and the Planners report. Clearly they are aware of public concern but their response is to amend the recommendation with   broad brush, irrelevant or just plain ludicrous justifications in favour of the proposal.

Mission Beach Cassowaries and C4 commissioned a report on the impact on cassowaries at their expense, something the Planning Department should have required the proponent to provide. The report concludes the proposal will  have  a significant impact on the   cassowaries  accessing the corridors  surrounding and adjacent to the proposed development.
​
​
The report now quotes from the Cassowary Recovery Plan but they don't   appear to have  found the Significant Impact Guidelines for cassowaries or the Wongaling Creek Habitat Linkages report that was used to inform cassowary corridors in the CCRC Planning Scheme.
Picture
Agenda item 7.2 Page 245
Is this all part of the ‘Activate Cassowary Coast - Development Incentive Plan that is attracting developers and speculators who have no understanding of the values special to Mission Beach?
​

Reports such as this indicate  a skew in favour of developer over public interests.

The proposal does not comply with the strategic intent and desired regional outcomes for Mission Beach  in regard to   agricultural land, the environment, the cassowary and the village amenity. It must be refused.
​
The proposal is also likely to have a significant impact on the endangered cassowary


Here's hoping the council will act in the public interest at their  general meeting on Thursday and at the very least defer their decision until independent impact reports are produced and the Federal Government has assessed the proposal under the EPBC Act.

Developers have an obligation to refer any development that is likely to have an impact on matters of National Environmental Significance i e World Heritage Areas and threatened species/ ecosystems, all of which are subject to impacts with this proposal.
3 Comments

Planning and Community expectation key issues at Mission Beach Rally

15/1/2021

2 Comments

 
Picture
​Over 200 residents  met at 10am 15th January for  an update on a  proposed  aviation facility they say will destroy their lifestyle and sense of place.

A strong message  was reaffirmed among those who attended that   there is a community expectation for  the council to  make decisions in the  public interest.  For Mission Beach residents  the  things that mold their sense of identity are the quiet, peaceful village atmosphere, the  exceptional natural  environment and the cassowary. They claim the proposed development  would have  an unacceptable  impact on all of those things.  The Planning Scheme  fails to  protect  the values the community say are the  reasons they live at Mission Beach.  
 
ABC TV reporter Jemima Burt was  there to cover the story.

 Liz Gallie  from Mission Beach Cassowaries, Peter Rowles of C4,   and   award winning tourism operator  of   Epic private Journeys, Pedro O'Connor addressed the  crowd   gathered   at Miter Street, located  close to the proposed heliport  flight path.

The  crowd acknowledged and welcomed  the attendance of   The Deputy Mayor, Councillor Barry Barnes.

Peter Rowles impressed  on the crowd the importance of using the Planning scheme to guide the future by avoiding  incompatible  land uses and the importance of  low impact eco based tourism at Mission Beach.

Pedro O'Connor said a helicopter facility would destroy  tourism potential at Mission Beach  adding Mission Beach has not been set up for  high end  tourism  instead known as a low key boutique destination.
​
​The community believes they are being   bamboozled by the conflicting claims and say they cannot trust  what is  being said  by the proponent or the planning department.


The following is quoted from the DA lodged in  February 2020 (the basis of  the public consultation),
"Specifically, the applicant proposes to develop an Aviation Facility at the subject site for the purpose of providing passenger transport inclusive of island connections from the region’s major airports (Cairns and Townsville) to support the local tourism sector. Associated uses including medical transfers, aerial firefighting and search and rescue operations will also be undertaken on an as required basis.
It also states the proposal is for air services used for any of the following :
  • The arrival and departure of aircraft;
  • The housing, servicing, refuelling, maintenance and repair of aircraft; 
  • The assembly and dispersal of passengers or goods on or  from an aircraft;
  • Any ancillary activities directly serving the needs of passengers and visitors to the use;
  •  Associated training and education facilities; and
  • Aviation facilities.
​
The following is from the  Planning Report   released on 7th December    recommending approval,   "Furthermore, the applicant has confirmed that the majority of the helicopters proposed to be stationed at this aviation facility are not proposed to be used for “joy flights”. The type of helicopters proposed are highly specialised multi-role helicopters and provide a range of services including aerial firefighting, heavy-lift and aerial crane, and reconnaissance missions. There is a direct linkage between the specialist nature of these helicopters, and the high cost of operation, the number of movements will generally be  lower than what would be expected from a tourism operation". 

The report claims the proposal is lower impact by excluding   tourism operations
Information now being circulated by the proponent  is  a direct contradiction of what  was in the DA claiming highly specialised craft will  not be used or stationed at the proposed facility. The following statement is being distributed by  Kestrel Aviation. 
3. Operational Purpose The primary use of the Mission Helicopters facility will be to conduct passenger transport operations from regional aviation hubs to support high-end tourism activities in the area. Helicopter island transfers are currently conducted to Bedarra and Dunk Island which are limited in capacity, and it is intended to offer to support those activities and other tourist opportunities to the islands and Great Barrier Reef.
Picture
Read info sheet
The Planners report also  claims agricultural activities can continue on the  lot as  the development  footprint is only 1.27% of the overall site. Yet the proponents plan shows approximately a third of the lot is allocated for  air services and the rest of the  lot designated for  future development.
Picture
(See detail right)
Picture
Detail
   A report commissioned by Mission Beach Cassowaries and C4, made available to the CCRC, confirms the development  will have a significant impact on the endangered cassowary. 

​Based on community expectation and the environmental report alone, the development should be refused. 
 At the very least, the CCRC decision  must be deferred until there has been:
  • An independent noise impact study carried out; 
  •  a specific and qualified expert report on the need for the facility, and 
  • State and Federal Government assessments of the impacts on  matters of State Environmental Significance  (MSES) and  matters of  National    Environmental   Significance. (MNES)"
​                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Liz Gallie  - Mission Beach Cassowaries 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information

Liz Gallie
​0414402315
2 Comments

Wet Tropic Times

15/1/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
0 Comments

7 News Cairns

15/1/2021

0 Comments

 
0 Comments
<<Previous
    Please show your support
    ​Sign the petition
    Picture
    Call to the Hon Tanya Plibersek to call in helicopter development for proper assessment

    Picture
    This website is managed by Mission Beach Cassowaries inc to share information about the No Helicopters Here campaign against  the approval of  A HELICOPTER BASE   on 2224 Tully Mission Beach Road.
    https://www.change.org/Consider-Mission-Beach-Residents-Amenity-Wildlife
    2022Aug26-Update-#1

    Picture
    Post your helicopter sightings on the No Helicopters Here facebook page
     Court appeal   chronology
    Picture
    28th February 2022.
    C4  entered into a  compromise  settlement with Mission Helicopters. The appeal did not proceed to a court  hearing. 

    Picture
     3rd December  2021
    The appeal was reviewed.  Judge Morzone ordered  (above) the appellant (C4) to provide a list of matters they wish to be considered for inclusion in the proposed conditions attached to any approval  of the development application.

    Picture
     3rd September  2021
      
     Order (above)  made  by his Honour Judge Morzone QC.​
    Appeal review listed for  3 December 2021

    Picture
    6th August 2021
    Court ordered MH to  respond to  C4 correspondence by  August 15th. Appeal review   listed for 3rd September.

    Picture
    3rd June 2021
    ​Grounds on which Mission Helicopters, as co respondent ,   defended the appeal .

    Picture
    5th Mar 2021
    C4  filed to appeal the  Heliport approval  decision

    Map-Generator



    Archives

    September 2022
    August 2022
    March 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • News
    • Media
    • Politicians addresses
  • Proposal
  • Helicopter Noise/safety